VIRB 360 vs Samsung Gear 360: Video and Photo Comparison

I’ve spent a few days shooting with my new Garmin VIRB 360 and I’m just starting to get the hang of its many features. The VIRB 360 is a 5.7K 360 camera that was hotly anticipated to become the top 360 camera of the year so far, but how does it compare with the Samsung Gear 360 (the 2017 edition)? I went out and shot some photos and videos with both cameras in the same environment so I could compare them directly. We’ll take a look at the footage a bit later but first lets look a the specifications of both cameras side by side to see what we are dealing with.

Garmin VIRB 360 vs Samsung Gear 360

Feature VIRB 360 Gear 360
Number of Lenses 2 x f/2.0 2 x f/2.4
Video Resolution 5.7K @ 30fps unstitched 4K @ 30fps stitched [email protected] 60fps unstitched 4096 x 2160 at 24 fps
Photo Resolution 15 Megapixels 5640 x 2816 15 Megapixels 5472 x 2736
360 Live-Stream 4K @ 30fps (Apple Only) 2k @ 24 fps
Stabilization 3 modes: stabilize, lock, follow (up to 4K) None
Waterproof Yes, up to 10m No
Shockproof Yes No
Memory MicroSD up to 128GB MicroSD up to 128GB
Battery 1 hour continuous video on full charge 1160 mAh (130 minutes continuous video)
Sensors Gyroscope Accelrometer GPS Barometer Compass None
Audio 360 Audio with 4 Mics Single Mic
Compatibility Android/Apple Apple confirmed
Price $800/£650 $230/£200
Where to Buy Amazon Amazon

Just by looking at those specifications, you would conclude that the VIRB 360 is superior to the Gear 360 in almost every way. The maximum video resolution is much higher in the VIRB, which can shoot at 5.7K. Photo resolution is almost identical but still slightly higher in the VIRB, not to mention the myriad of sensors extra features such as being waterproof to 10m. Never the less, there are a few catches that the spec sheet doesn’t fully reveal.

While the VIRB can shoot 360 video at 5.7K (a much higher resolution than almost all other 360 cameras), it cannot stitch the videos together at this resolution. What this means is that when you shoot at 5.7K on the VIRB 360 you will output two separate video files which you much stitch together yourself using software. This is a time consuming process and may be beyond what many people will tolerate. Thankfully the VIRB 360 can stitch 360 video at 4K resolution so you’ll be able to use your vieo straight away.

For the purposes of this comparison I’ll be comparing the video of the Samsung Gear 360 against the video form the VIRB 360 at 4K resolution. Like I said, the VIRB can shoot at 5.7K which will almost certainly look better, but most casual users won’t want to go through the process of manual stitching, so I’m keeping this a 4K comparison. Photo’s are stitched automatically so no issues there!

VIRB 360 vs Gear 360 – Video Comparison

I shot the above video using both the Garmin VIRB 360 and the Samsung Gear 360 at the same time and using the same tripod. Both videos were shot at 4K resolution, but you can still see a significant difference between the footage. The VIRB seems to produce much sharper footage and the colors are most accurate, still, the Gear 360 holds its own and still looks fairly decent. The audio is another factor, you may not be able to hear it here but the VIRB is able to record 360 audio, where as the Gear 360 has notoriously poor audio quality.

VIRB 360 vs Gear 360 – Photo Comparison

These photos have been down-scaled so they fit on this website, it reality they would both be around 5500 x 2700, but as you can see the VIRB produces slightly larger images. As for the image quality I think the VIRB wins again thanks to a sharper image and more accurate coloring. The colors in the Gear 360 shot looks over saturated compared to the VIRB and the details are much less apparent. While the VIRB 360 photo looks great, at 15 megapixels it’s still a rather small image for 360 photos. Considering the 2016 Gear 360 can shoot 30 megapixel 360 photos I would have expected the newer, and much more expensive, VIRB 360 to be able to at least equal it.

Conclusion

The VIRB wins this comparison as far as I’m concerned, but that’s hardly a surprise considering that it’s nearly $600 more expensive, but is it worth the extra expense? The quality of the video is significantly better and you’ll be able to shoot at the even higher resolution of 5.7K, but $600 is a lot of money and the photo quality isn’t much greater. The VIRB also has several other features to consider though, such as half a dozen sensors, augmented reality overlays and water resistance to 10m. To summarise, the VIRB 360 certainly produces better quality 360 video than the Samsung Gear 360, but that’s not a good enough reason to get it. The VIRB is primarily an action cam so you should probably only consider buying it if you are going to use every feature.

I’ll be creating a full review of the Garmin VIRB 360 once I’ve tested out all the features, in the meantime you can see all the videos I shoot with the VIRB on my YouTube channel. If you can’t wait to get your own VIRB 360 you can do so now on Amazon!

 


Watch my latest video

Tags:

360 camera expert, 360 photographer and lover of banoffee pie. Follow me on Instagram and YouTube for awesome 360 content.

1 Comment
  1. Reply
    Henry 7th July 2017 at 1:39 am

    Just got my Samsung Gear 360 v2017 edition from eBay for a mere $120 delivered today. I have yet to test it out. People are selling them since they came as a promo an extra $40 or so and then reselling them I believe.

    I think the Garmin falls under a different category. It more for serious users. Who don’t mind post stitching to get better results for high quality. The reason it can’t stitch on the camera is often due to processing power and the amount of heat these devices give off. The Garmin has image stabilization built in which is a big plus and has augmented reality info that it can superimpose which I think a certain segment of the population for focused on health and triathlons might be more interested in.

    The Samsung is for the lay user who doesn’t mind less than pro level video results. ie. good enough for lay person.

Leave a reply